Monday

Aspects of heritage and ontological security -I


The following text was produced by invitation of artist Andrea Jespersen for a publication on the topic of "Healing" currently in the works. 
My immediate reaction from a background in architecture and heritage planning to the subject matter was to think of the strong need to expurge material remains associated with painful events from the built environment and the conflicting need for ontological security through continuity of the built environment on the other. These conflicts between continuity of use and function (re-appropriating a site, demolishment and new construction) and continuity of the physical building elements (listing  as a heritage site) are expressed in the recent public discussions on the future of Utøya, the site of the mass murder of 69 persons in the summer of 2011. For a background summary of the Norway attacks including the bombing of Oslo government quarters, trial and public reactions follow this link.

SCARS, SCABS AND PHANTOM LIMBS IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Utøya the day of the attack, July 22, 2011, photo by Niclas Hammarström, World Press Photo 2012, Spot News, 2nd prize stories
Utøya […] an island in Tyrifjorden lake, Norway […] owned by AUF, the youth wing of the Labour Party, which holds annual summercamps there […] On 22 July 2011, a mass shooting took place at AUF's summer camp, where 650 young people were staying […] arrived on Utøya dressed as a police officer […] then began shooting […] attacks in Oslo and Utøya left 77 dead, with 69 killed on the island, 33 of whom under the age of 18 […] The future of Utøya has been the source of disagreements among the victims and family of the attacks. While AUF's plan is to rebuild and return to Utøya, others want to leave the island as a memorial to the dead. Excised from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utøya

"Utøya- your own island!" Summercamps on Utøya were held since 1933. A series of historic photographs from the archives of the Norwegian labour movement
“New Utøya” for 60 million Norwegian kroner to be completed by 2015 […] The background for this work is sinister, but we hope to rebuild Utøya, says[…]at the press-conference[…]We wish to honour the victims by keeping the island in use. It would be sad if the island became derelict and overgrown […]
Excised from 

Plans for New Utøya. Copyright and Credit MIR AS and Fantastic Norway AS. Click for link to project description
Official website of Utøya ww.utoya.no

[…] no demolishments on Utøya before consensus of all concerned parties is reached […] presented plans for “New Utøya”. The previous day, the organisation applied for permission […] to demolish the cafeteria and pumphouse, locations where a large number of youth were brutally shot and killed on July 22, 2011. Psychologist […] thinks the opinions of the bereaved families should weigh most” […] experienced as the location of many execution sites, it is not easy to re-imagine it as a public place for recreation […]
Traumaexperts ask to postpone Utøya-plans […] Several bereaved experience new summercamps on the islands as a transgression. At the same time many in AUF want to return to the island to honour the dead […] “I advise not to force decisions too heavy to bear for survivors and bereaved families. It is important to take the time needed to really think through if the island is to be used as before […]

[…] “If they demolish the cafeteria and pump-house as planned, we will also demolish parts of their associated history. July 22 is part of our history, but it is also part of Norway´s history” […]  lost their daughters in the atrocious attack on the island on July 22 last year. Together with 200 other bereaved they sent letters to AUF, county and municipal government and the Directorate for Cultural Heritage, requesting for Utøya to be listed as a heritage site […]

Utøya the day after the attack, July 22, 2011. Photocredit: Adrian Øhrn Johansen/Dagbladet

[…] lost her son […] on July 22 last year. She reacts strongly to the plans for Utøya presented today. “My message to […] is that he can forget about rebuilding Utøya. This island should be listed. You can´t trample on the grave of 69 people[…]have spent lots of time and resources on the rebuilding of Utøya. I consider it naïve of them to believe that we who have lost our children will accept this.” […] She is supported by Utøya-survivor[…]who commented on twitter “ […] shocked over how fast […] wants to start building work on the scene of massmurder, such politics are inhumane” […] survived Utøya himself, but lost several friends at the summercamp. He approves of the plans […] considers it important that Utøya continues to be actively used for AUF´s political and social gatherings. “Some think leaving Utøya creates a memorial for the fallen […] this would be equal to making the island a trophy for the perpetrator” […]

An obvious association: "Die Toteninsel" by Swiss Symbolist painter Arnold Böcklin 


[…] Utøya is the scene of the biggest peacetime massacre in Norway. It is our Auschwitz […] It would be disrespectful against the dead and bereaved to arrange summercamps, parties and recreation in such a place […] Utøya should be preserved; it should be a site for silence and remembrance […] A monument against all the perpetrator stood for and did […] Let Utøya have the value it now has as symbol. Don´t trample on the graves of the dead. Don´t open the scars after this national trauma. We should let the dead rest in peace […]


Plans for New Utøya. Copyright and Credit MIR AS and Fantastic Norway AS. Click for link to project description

[…] these acts of terror were public, but the killings of our loved ones and the grief over their loss are experienced privatly […] Utøya does not have to be listed for our loved ones to be honoured and remembered. Utøya is a crimescene, not a gravesite […] We wish that Utøya will be used to honour and remember our loved ones, by remaining a living island filled with active and dedicated youth. Excised from http://gunkies.org/utoya/


Documentation of crimescene by the Norwegian Police, shown under the trial in 2012. The cafeteria building, where 13 bodies were found on the left. 
[…] in regard to your request to preserve all buildings on Utøya as narrative historical elements, conflicting with […] plans to rebuild Utøya […] We acknowledge many diverging opinions about Utøya´s future, also amongst those that experienced the tragedy at close hold. Although Utøya and its buildings can be ascribed certain historic values as the location of political gatherings, the buildings themselves do not have sufficient value to justify a listing according to the Cultural Heritage Act. After careful consideration, the Directorate concludes that we do not wish to use the deeply tragic events of July 22, 2011 as basis for listing […]